先看看示例
作者提供的示例，实际效果取决于你的输入和使用工具。
输入
任务：修复登录后跳错页。已有：稳定复现，尚未定位；期望：代码修改、回归验证；不需要新设计。
输出
编辑示例 · 未运行
当前路径：先进入系统化调试，追踪登录成功后的重定向来源。
后续：定位原因后做限定范围修复，并用原复现场景验证。
暂不需要：新产品需求探索或界面方向选择。
交付条件：原故障不能复现，相关登录路径仍正常，报告实际验证范围。
前提：配套调试与验证技能可用，项目权限允许读取和修改相关代码。
方法说明
--- name: using-superpowers description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions --- <SUBAGENT-STOP> If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, ignore this skill. </SUBAGENT-STOP> <EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill. IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT. This is not negotiable. You cannot rationalize your way out of this. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> ## The Rule **Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action** — including clarifying questions, exploring the codebase, or checking files. If it turns out wrong for the situation, you don't have to use it. **Before entering plan mode:** if you haven't already brainstormed, invoke the brainstorming skill first. Then announce "Using [skill] to [purpose]" and follow the skill exactly. If it has a checklist, create a todo per item. ## Skill Priority When multiple skills apply, process skills come first — they set the approach, then implementation skills (frontend-design, etc.) carry it out. Brainstorming and systematic-debugging are Superpowers' most common process skills, but the rule holds for any of them. - "Let's build X" → superpowers:brainstorming first, then implementation skills. - "Fix this bug" → superpowers:systematic-debugging first, then domain skills. ## Red Flags These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing: | Thought | Reality | |---------|---------| | "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. | | "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. | | "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. | | "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. | | "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. | | "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. | | "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. | | "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. | | "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. | | "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. | | "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. | | "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. | ## Platform Adaptation If your harness appears here, read its reference file for special instructions: - Claude Code: `references/claude-code-tools.md` - Codex: `references/codex-tools.md` - Pi: `references/pi-tools.md` - Antigravity: `references/antigravity-tools.md` - Hermes Agent: `references/hermes-tools.md` - Muse: `references/muse-tools.md` ## User Instructions User instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, etc, direct requests) take precedence over skills, which in turn override default behavior. Only skip skill workflows or instructions when your human partner has explicitly told you to.